← Projects

Maritime Rescue Drone

A desk study for a long-range, solar-assisted search-and-rescue UAV: what the literature supports, what vendors only claim, and what nobody has shown yet.

Concept stage. Nothing described here has been built or flown. Sources last checked Oct 11, 2026.

Evidence tags

Checked
Confirmed against the primary source, or recomputed.
Reported
Stated by a cited source; not independently re-checked.
Vendor claim
A manufacturer's or seller's own figure.
Open
No independent evidence found.
Proposal
A design decision of mine, not a finding.
On this page

Working design decisions

Seven crucial decisions backed by the literature, to be revisited when a budget is established.

  • Proposal

    Fixed-wing for cruise and loiter. Add VTOL only if launch and recovery sites demand it, because it costs mass, drag and transition complexity.

  • Proposal

    Treat solar as a supplement to the battery, not a replacement, at small-UAV scale.

  • Proposal

    Pair thermal and RGB imagery, screen onboard, and keep a human confirming every detection to start.

  • Proposal

    Layer the links: direct RF near shore, satellite for offshore command and telemetry, mesh only where every hop holds.

  • Proposal

    Fuse multi-constellation GNSS with an inertial unit, add independent heading and altitude, and define the lost-navigation response in advance.

  • Proposal

    Build hybrid: carbon fiber for loaded structure, 3D-printed interfaces, mounts and enclosures, and coupon-test any printed structural part first.

  • Proposal

    Start avionics from PX4 and Pixhawk open designs, and validate the assembled aircraft rather than the bare board.

Solar airframes

Flexible cells have lengthened small-UAV flights, but they supplement a battery. What counts is power delivered per added gram over the whole mission, not panel nameplate efficiency.

  • Checked

    The Air Force Research Laboratory fitted flexible cells to the removable wing sections of a Raven hand-launched UAV. Three prototypes showed 60% longer endurance, and the lab said 100% looked achievable. Each 20 cm² cell bonds to the wing under clear film, and a power module with maximum-power-point tracking feeds the battery.1

  • Checked

    Maryland's Robo Raven III, a flapping-wing micro air vehicle, covered under half its wing with cells that produced about 3.6 W in full sun at roughly 6% efficiency. Its motors drew about 30 W, an order of magnitude more than the solar output.2

  • Checked

    NASA's Centurion, a 206-foot solar flying wing, was designed with arrays over about 80% of the upper wing producing up to 31 kW at summer noon. Its first flights ran on batteries. It shows what large solar aircraft look like, not what a small drone can expect.3

  • Reported

    One European roll-to-roll CIGS project reached 20% cell efficiency in the lab, but its pilot-line modules came in around 11.7%. Compare installed module output, not cell records.4

  • Open

    No source found establishes a general efficiency penalty for wing curvature. The effect depends on the cell stack, the wing's actual curvature, and how sunlight meets each part of it.

  • Proposal

    Lay out cell boundaries from the real wing surface. Flexible sheets follow gentle one-direction curvature but tend to wrinkle on compound curvature. Series strings lose output when part of the array is shaded or faces a different way in a bank, so string layout, bypass protection and power-point tracking matter as much as the cells.

For this build

Write the mission energy budget first, then decide how much wing to cover. Test the installed wing in flight; a flat panel on a bench cannot show in-flight benefit.

Sources (4)
  1. AFRL Solar Raven (sUAS News, 2012)
  2. Robo Raven Flies on Solar Power (IEEE Spectrum, 2013)
  3. NASA Centurion
  4. R2R-CIGS final report (EU CORDIS)

Thermal imaging and onboard AI

Thermal drone payloads are mature. Autonomous person detection over open water is not independently validated, so design is set for AI triage with a human deciding.

  • Checked

    SeaDronesSee, the main public UAV benchmark for people in open water, has over 54,000 annotated frames and 400,000 labeled instances, captured from 5 to 260 m altitude at viewing angles of 0 to 90°.1

  • Reported

    Its large dataset is visible-light imagery, so thermal detection needs thermal training data of its own.1

  • Checked

    A 2024 Sensors paper trained an improved YOLOv5s on 5,736 thermal images of aquatic scenes plus synthetic images, reporting 85.49% average detection accuracy at 23.51 FPS. That is the authors' own dataset, not a drone-at-sea test, and the authors flag tiny targets and seasonal and weather variation.2

  • Reported

    A 2025 survey of maritime SAR imagery finds people are tiny relative to the search area, waves and foam cause false alarms, and labeled real-world data is scarce.3

  • Reported

    Element 84's SAR pipeline screens video with a fast thermal model, passes candidates to a detailed optical detector, and geolocates hits from flight metadata and camera calibration. It ran on a Steam Deck, not a Jetson.4

  • Vendor claim

    NVIDIA lists Jetson Orin NX at up to 100 TOPS in a configurable 10–25 W envelope. TOPS do not predict frame rate for a given detector.5

  • Vendor claim

    DJI's search-and-rescue pages describe thermal payloads of 640×512 (Matrice 30T) and 1280×1024 (Zenmuse H30T) pixels, with stated flight times of 41 and 59 minutes. The workflow described is operator-driven rather than validated automatic detection over water.6

  • Open

    No public, independently evaluated benchmark was found for thermal AI detecting real people in open water from a drone, across sea states, weather and day or night.

For this build

Thermal plus RGB, a fast onboard screening model, tracking across frames, geolocated alerts, and realistically an operator who confirms individual flags. Report recall, false alerts and time-to-detect per condition (altitude, sea state, thermal contrast), never one aggregate score. Choose compute by measured end-to-end latency and power with the real camera and model.

Sources (6)
  1. SeaDronesSee benchmark (arXiv, WACV 2022)
  2. Personnel detection in dark aquatic environments (Sensors, 2024)
  3. Maritime SAR missions with aerial images (survey, 2025)
  4. Element 84: SAR machine learning on the edge
  5. NVIDIA Jetson Orin
  6. DJI: search and rescue

Fabrication

Print the interfaces, not the spars. FDM for iteration, SLS nylon for tougher small batches, and metal only for a justified part with a partner lab.

  • Reported

    FDM is cheapest and fastest for iteration but weakest between layers. SLS nylon suits durable brackets and housings. SLA gives fine detail, but many resins are brittle and degrade in UV. Metal additive manufacturing needs specialist equipment and inspection.1

  • Reported

    In a 2023 study of multirotor airframe specimens, FDM and SLS parts reached up to about 40 MPa, while continuous-fiber specimens reached at least four times that. Print direction changed the results.2

  • Reported

    A published multirotor design framework printed custom joints and mounts and combined them with carbon-fiber tubes and plates, the hybrid approach proposed here.3

  • Reported

    A 2024 flying-wing prototype printed in PLA on a desktop printer was a proof of concept. Its authors say durability needs more investigation.4

  • Reported

    A 2025 test-stand study of printed propellers found resin gave the highest thrust and PETG the best resistance to axial loading. Print propellers only for contained test-stand work.5

  • Reported

    General Atomics and Norsk Titanium described a printed Ti-6Al-4V wing splice for an unmanned aircraft. The article does not show flight qualification.6

For this build

Print enclosures, sensor mounts, ducts and fairings first. Treat motor mounts, arm joints and landing gear as candidates only after coupon tests in the loaded orientation, then static, vibration and flight tests against a machined baseline. See the Ohio State section for printers and shops.

Sources (6)
  1. Formlabs: FDM vs SLA vs SLS
  2. Composite-printed multirotor airframe parts (PMC, 2023)
  3. Framework for additive manufacturing of multirotor parts
  4. PLA flying-wing prototype (PMC, 2024)
  5. 3D-printed UAV propellers (PMC, 2025)
  6. Printed titanium wing splice (Additive Manufacturing Media)

Airframe and endurance

Choose the configuration from the mission: fixed-wing for distance and loiter, multirotor only where hovering is the job.

  • Reported

    Maximum endurance and maximum range occur at different airspeeds, and both shift with weight and altitude. Optimize at the speed the aircraft will actually fly.1

  • Checked

    Induced drag falls as aspect ratio rises (C_Di ≈ C_L² / (π·e·AR)), so long slender wings suit lift-heavy missions.

  • Reported

    High-aspect-ratio wings can be soft in bending and torsion, which lowers flutter speed, so aeroelastic stability belongs in the early design loop.2

  • Reported

    For multirotors, endurance and optimal speed come from the whole propeller, motor and battery system, not from hover power alone.3

  • Reported

    A NASA study of high-altitude long-endurance aircraft found that maximizing endurance alone can give a poor mission solution, with energy-storage density and solar-cell efficiency as key drivers.4

  • Reported

    Morphing wings can in principle adapt to climb, cruise and loiter, but actuators, skins and controls add mass and complexity. Benefits must be judged for the whole aircraft.5

  • Reported

    The Sun Falcon 2 paper documents a design loop linking aerodynamics, airframe mass, battery and solar energy. It reports only short initial flight tests, not its multi-day goal.6

  • Reported

    ETH Zurich's AtlantikSolar is a practical research example of a solar UAV built for multi-day flight.7

For this build

A fixed-wing with a tapered wing and tailored twist. Set aspect ratio by an aero-structural trade, not by maximizing it. Use passive shaping before any morphing, and close the day and night energy balance before cutting parts.

Sources (7)
  1. ERAU: flight range and endurance
  2. DLR: aeroelastic stability of high-aspect-ratio wings
  3. Bauersfeld & Scaramuzza: multicopter range and endurance
  4. NASA: high-altitude long-endurance alternatives
  5. Giuliani et al.: aircraft morphing review (PMC)
  6. Harasani: Sun Falcon 2 design and flight test
  7. ETH Zurich: AtlantikSolar

Avionics and PCB design

Keep high-current power, quiet sensors and RF apart on the board, then prove the arrangement works in the assembled aircraft.

  • Reported

    Pixhawk open standards and PX4 reference designs document controller architecture, connectors, pinouts and layout guidance, a sound starting point for a compatible board.12

  • Reported

    A power distribution board feeds the ESCs and motors. A power module also supplies regulated flight-controller power and the battery measurements used for failsafes.3

  • Reported

    IPC-2152 relates conductor size, copper weight and board construction to current and temperature rise. Validate critical high-current paths with thermal measurement, not only a trace-width calculator.4

  • Reported

    PX4 warns that vibration can clip sensors and break the estimator. Fix it at the source, with balanced propellers and quality parts, before relying on software filters.5

  • Reported

    Mount the controller near the center of gravity in a known orientation, or configure IMU position offsets.6

  • Proposal

    Likely noise sources are ESC switching, motor wiring, DC-DC converters and radios. Keep sensitive circuits, antennas and magnetometers away from switching loops and high-current paths, and test GNSS and links with the motors running.

For this build

Validate in order: bench power and brownout behavior, thermal and load, vibration of the assembled mount, GNSS and link quality with motors running, then environmental and flight tests with logging on.

Sources (6)
  1. Pixhawk standards
  2. PX4: reference flight controller design
  3. PX4: power modules and PDBs
  4. IPC-2152 trace current overview (Proto-Express)
  5. PX4: vibration isolation
  6. PX4: mounting and orienting the controller

Fleet coordination

Commercial drone swarms are mostly human-supervised fleet platforms. Autonomous cooperative search is mostly research.

  • Vendor claim

    Skydio and DJI publicly describe alert-to-dispatch workflows: an alert supplies coordinates, software picks a ready aircraft or dock, an operator confirms, video is shared and records are archived. Neither publishes a full backend design.12

  • Reported

    Multi-UAV search research splits a region into cells, allocates them across aircraft with different payloads and endurance, and routes around no-fly zones. One platform was demonstrated in a real SAR scenario.3

  • Reported

    Dynamic task-assignment research clusters tasks, assigns them locally, and uses a central controller to relocate idle aircraft. Static plans fail when tasks appear or aircraft drop out.4

  • Reported

    Fleet software is not airspace management. NASA's UTM concept makes separation a shared responsibility among service suppliers, aircraft and other airspace users.5

  • Proposal

    A hybrid pattern suits rescue: a central service for assignment, policy and audit, and onboard logic for time-critical local decisions.

  • Proposal

    Keep incident, mission and flight as separate records, since one call can start several missions and one mission several flights. Store event history rather than only current state, telemetry in a time-series store, and video in object storage with integrity hashes.

For this build

The data model above is my proposal. Commercial platforms don't publish their schemas, so this is simply my improvisation. A fleet needs a central service for assignment, policy and audit, and onboard logic for time-critical local decisions.

Sources (5)
  1. Skydio DFR Command
  2. DJI: Dock as First Responder
  3. Cooperative multi-UAV coverage mission planning (arXiv)
  4. Dynamic multi-UAV task assignment (PMC)
  5. NASA: UTM concept of operations

Ohio State resources

Most of what is useful is gated by a faculty sponsor, training or project approval. Most resources require approval or an application.

Where to start

  • Reported

    The Aerospace Research Center lists a UAS fleet, wind tunnels from subsonic to supersonic, and FAA-approved test sites at the Ohio State Airport (KOSU), the Molly Caren Agricultural Center and the US-33 Smart Corridor.12

  • Reported

    LADDCS works on autonomous UAS, including prescribed-burn monitoring. Matt McCrink's group covers rotorcraft, flight testing and low-altitude traffic management with ODOT and the FAA, and students build drones in-house.34

  • Reported

    ASPIN, directed by Zak Kassas, works on GNSS-denied and radio-based navigation.5

  • Reported

    The ElectroScience Laboratory covers antennas, radar, GNSS and interference, with an anechoic RF facility. K.I.N.D. Lab researches infrared detectors; I found no public equipment-loan program for a drone payload.67

Fabrication and compute

  • Reported

    College of Engineering makerspaces (Bolz and EREL) require registration and a waiver renewed annually.8

  • Reported

    MAE's machine shops include the Webster student shop, which welcomes students without machining experience, and a Rapid Prototype Lab. The research shop requires supervision.9

  • Reported

    The Manufacturing and Materials Joining Innovation Center lists polymer FDM printers, a small laser powder-bed-fusion system and robotic welding. Arrange access through the center.10

  • Reported

    The Ohio Supercomputer Center's Ascend cluster has NVIDIA A100 GPUs for model training. Students get access through a project led by an eligible faculty PI.11

Precedents

  • Checked

    On Aug. 30, 2017, an Ohio State jet UAV flew autonomously at a sustained 147 mph over a roughly 28-mile out-and-back course from Kelleys Island over Lake Erie, in a 17-minute flight. It carried a satellite link, redundant radio links and ADS-B in and out, and flew under an FAA waiver. The record was pending verification when announced.12

  • Checked

    The student team The Sloopy Works flew STUART, an autonomous vertical-takeoff rescue aircraft, to a 100-foot marker at the Ohio State Airport on Sept. 25, 2025, at about 23 feet above ground and 3.4 feet per second. The $28,571 NASA-supported GoAERO award went to that team, not to students generally.131415

  • Reported

    ParaWave, founded by aerospace-engineering graduates through the President's Buckeye Accelerator, builds first-responder drones shaped by feedback from central Ohio agencies.16

  • Reported

    Ohio State Police announced plans for rooftop drone launch sites in January 2026. Operational details had not been released.17

Funding

  • Checked

    URAP pays student wages for faculty-mentored research, capped at 456 hours. You need a faculty mentor first and cannot hold other funding for the same project. Ohio State says it funds about 60 students a year. The $13 per hour figure is from a 2023 cycle page, so confirm the current wage and dates.18

  • Checked

    In its third annual round (2024), the President's Buckeye Accelerator gave $50,000 each to six student teams.19

  • Checked

    BuildX's summer accelerator reports $15,000 in funding for selected teams, plus coaching and workspace. Confirm current terms.20

  • Reported

    Accelerator Awards of up to $100,000 are for university-managed inventions and require an invention disclosure. They are not student research grants.21

  • Open

    No Ohio State grant earmarked for a student-built SAR drone was found. The realistic path is a faculty-led project plus student-support funding.

Flying on or near campus

  • Checked

    Ohio State is a no-fly zone for drones without prior approval. Requests go through the Department of Public Safety at least 14 days ahead, and Ohio State can deny them. A November 2025 interim update made this explicit, and the policy was still interim when checked.2223

  • Checked

    University-sponsored research flights off campus need prior notice to the university and confirmation of the appropriate flight authorizations. University approval and FAA authorization are separate checks.24

Sources (24)
  1. Ohio State ARC: research and testing facilities
  2. Ohio State ARC: FAA-approved UAS test sites
  3. LADDCS research (Ohio State MAE)
  4. Matt McCrink's drone research (Ohio State)
  5. Zak Kassas, ASPIN Lab (Ohio State)
  6. ElectroScience Laboratory
  7. K.I.N.D. Laboratory
  8. College of Engineering makerspaces
  9. MAE department machine shops
  10. Ma²JIC laboratory capabilities
  11. Ohio Supercomputer Center: Ascend
  12. Ohio State sets drone world speed record (2017)
  13. At Ohio State, the race to reshape emergency rescue tech
  14. eVTOL News: The Sloopy Works STUART
  15. Rescue aircraft team wins NASA university innovation funding
  16. ParaWave (Ohio State)
  17. WOSU: OSU Police rooftop drones (Jan 2026)
  18. Undergraduate Research Apprenticeship Program
  19. President's Buckeye Accelerator
  20. BuildX initiative (Ohio State News)
  21. Accelerator Awards
  22. Ohio State Risk Management: UAS
  23. DPS: UAS interim policy update (Nov 2025)
  24. CFAES Safety: UAS

What is still unproven

Where the evidence is thin, so nobody mistakes a plan for a result.

  • Open

    Thermal-AI person detection from drones in real sea states has no independent benchmark. Closing it takes thermal footage of people in water under varied conditions, scored per condition.

  • Open

    The benefit or penalty of curved solar cells on a UAV wing is design-specific. Only an installed-article test in flight settles it.

  • Open

    Mesh relay range figures are almost all vendor claims. Test hop by hop at the real altitudes.

  • Open

    Printed structural parts show encouraging results but need orientation-aware, fatigue and vibration testing, and printed propellers belong only on guarded stands.

  • Open

    Commercial fleet backends are not public, so the data model in these notes is a proposal.

  • Open

    The beyond-visual-line-of-sight approval pathway is jurisdiction-specific, and the FAA pages I needed were not retrievable. Check current waiver and authorization terms for the real route.